Companies Using DITA

Companies Using DITA

Update, November 29, 2024: Updating this list of companies using DITA is long overdue. This update essentially prunes the list of the many (132) companies that have either merged or no longer exist since I did the last update a couple of years ago. For the remainder, all company names and URLs have been updated where they have changed.

I had planned to do a thorough update earlier this year, but a hard drive crash ended up eating about three months of work. While the list of companies here has shrunk, it is worth noting that I did a survey for a client last year that revealed many more firms (about 1,000) that are using DITA. That information is embargoed until mid-2026, so it does not appear here. My plan going forward is to continue researching firms that are using DITA and add them incrementally to this public list.

And if you work for a firm that is using DITA that does not appear here, please email me.

Here’s the list (with 673 firms currently listed):

Caveats: please keep in mind that this is an informal list, based on my own research. From my experience, there are often several documentation departments in a firm, especially in larger companies, so it is entirely possible that one division within a company is using DITA XML extensively while another has not even heard about it. Also, over time things do change, and a firm listed here that started using DITA may have moved on to something else, or have been merged into another company, or the company itself has ceased to exist.

126 thoughts on “Companies Using DITA

  1. Does anybody know if there’s a listing someplace of DITA adoption growth by industry? Thanks in advance.

    1. I’m not aware of any such study or listing, though the original OASIS list of DITA-related firms that used to exist did list the industry segment each firm fell into.

      Belatedly I am sorting the information I have above into industry segments. Look for an update in the future that provides this information for each firm listed here.

    1. Thanks Pradeep! I am sure you are right, but I don’t want to leap to any unfounded conclusions either. They *could* be doing their documentation using some other XML schema, like DocBook for example. So will hold off on listing them until there is further evidence.

  2. At my current company, DITA Exchange, we use our own product to drive our web-site (www.ditaexchange.com). We provide DITA solutions for “classic” tech-docs as well as the regulated Life Sciences industry.
    My former company, LORENZ Life Sciences, uses DITA for software product manuals.

    1. Thank you! I have added both firms to my master list, and when I launch the “Mk III” version of the company listing early next week, they will both appear in it.

    1. Thank you for this information. I have added them to my master list and Huawei will appear in the “Mark III” update later this week!

    1. Thank you Charlie! I’ve added FAF and Ovitas to the list, though I left off Deloitte as they are already on the list.

    1. Thanks for letting me know! The firm has been duly removed from the listing.

      For others reading this posting, I have investigated and apparently the firm once had plans to use DITA but is no longer using DITA in their documentation process.

    1. Looks like there’s not enough info on your (very new?) site for me to add it to the list. At the very least I need a city/country to place Webacco in. Also, what do you use DITA for at your firm?

  3. Pingback: Not Found
  4. Keith, this list is very useful. Thanks! One way it could be even more useful would be to include pointers to the DITA-generated content that the companies offer on the web, if any. For example, we recently started publishing our user help content at help.salesforce.com. (All the links under “Documentation” go to DITA-generated content.) I only know of a few other public (i.e. no login) help sites like this, but I’d love to find more of them.

    1. I would like to do that, but the information I am able to find points more to the fact that a doc team within a company is using DITA, rather than the specific material that they put out. I do have a listing of confirmed DITA-produced output which can be found here, but it is small compared to the overall number of firms using DITA.

      Thanks also for mentioning your firm’s DITA-produced content — I will add that to the list on the aforementioned page. Cheers!

  5. You should add two columns to this list: Additional resources (for links to slide decks and case studies) and how it’s being used in the company with a list of roles/departments and/or doctypes.

    1. You have a good point Noz! Sadly, in most cases this type of information is not readily available, but in a future update I may consider adding what extra information is available that I can find.

      While this list shows which companies are using DITA, it does not give an example of the full breadth of how and where it is being used. So while I list the HQ of an organization as the “default” location, in many cases DITA may not be used there at all, but instead at one or often more locations at branch offices the company where either tech docs or communications are done. Over time I find that this information changes, as companies shift the internal ownership of tech docs within or between divisions (for larger firms in particular) so any information I post about that is likely to be out-of-date before long.

      It does make sense to me to post what other information I can, like case studies and links to sample DITA-produced docs. That is likely to be a small fraction of the full list, as not everyone is so forthcoming about their tech doc processes.

      Cheers!

  6. Pingback: Not Found
  7. I have an older list from March of 2014 that has a column for which industry the company is from. I don’t see that on the current list on this page. Perhaps I pulled it from somewhere else. Was there ever such a column on this site?

    1. Yes, I previously had “company sector” section for the listing on this page, and I removed it primarily because I couldn’t easily fit that information along with everything within the boundaries/margins. It also appears that anyone who is looking for a job using this listing are more interested in finding out where a company is located rather than the sector they are in.

      I still keep and maintain that information however, and if I can ever figure out how to expand the margins in the existing WordPress theme I will definitely add it back.

      If you are looking for information on specific firms operating in a specific sector, send me an email and I can send you that information. Cheers!

  8. I am planning to use the information to show adoption of DITA in industries related to our own: Semiconductors, Wireless, Networking, telecommunications, electrical/electronic manufacturing, information technology and services. For this use, location is irrelevant.

    Perhaps you can have a link to a page where the industry is shown instead of location. Most large companies have locations all over the world, and someone looking for a list of DITA adoption doesn’t care about location.

    1. Just so that others are aware, I responded to John K.’s request offline, and sent him the information he wanted. If there is anyone else who is looking for similar information, please let me know.

      1. Hello,

        We’re also in the semiconductor industry and are looking to implement a DITA workflow. Can you please send me the same information? Thank you.

        1. Send an email to me at keith AT ditawriter.com and I’ll collate and send the latest information to you. (All I get from your login is your company, not your email).

  9. Hi there fantgastic blog! Does running a blog similar to this require a
    lot oof work? I have no exlertise in coding however
    I haad been hoping tto start my own blo in the near future.
    Anyways, shoul youu have any recommendations or techniques ffor new blog
    owners please share. I understand this is off tpic nevertheless I simply
    wated too ask. Manny thanks!

  10. Hi Keith,
    thanks for the list – it’s great to see who else is using DITA.
    My company uses DITA as well – COPRA System in Berlin, Germany.

  11. Hi Keith,

    YAMAGATA INTECH works with DITA.
    Company: YAMAGATA INTECH (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    Industry type: Consultancy (one of worldwide Language service provider)
    HQ Location: Yokohama
    Country: Japan

    Would you pls add us to the listing, thanks!

  12. The U.S. Federal Reserve uses DITA for reports and minutes (but not currently for its bank inspector manuals, although that may be changing).

    1. Thanks for letting me know! I am planning on doing an update to the whole list soon and RSSB will be there.

  13. Tweddle Group, as a supplier to several automobile manufacturers worldwide, writes, translates, and delivers vehicle owner information (i.e. glovebox manuals, onboard information systems, mobile apps), and service information (manufacturer dealer service websites and service bay diagnostic applications). We are using DITA XML on multiple CMS instances to create and deliver this content.

    HQ: Clinton Township, MI (metro Detroit)
    International offices: Belgium, Italy, China

    1. Hello there: I actually have Tweddle Group in my listing of DITA Consulting Firms at: https://www.ditawriter.com/dita-consultants-listing/, as I understand your firm creates content for other companies (which is one of the categories). Tweddle was formerly listed on this page, and then I moved it–along with several other, similar firms–to the other page. If you think the listing on the consultants page needs updating, please let me know!

      1. Hi, Keith,
        While I somewhat understand the logic of listing us there instead of here, I personally feel that we align here much better. The supply chain of large manufacturing industry verticals is easily misunderstood. Does Tweddle “consult”? Yes and no. As an automotive supplier, we contract with OEMs. We become their “pubs groups”; we don’t work with their people; we ARE their people. I have a hard time associating the term “consultant” with what we are, a 700-employee, $200M company that delivers 12 million owners information glovebox kits per year, and, using the single-sourcing that DITA encourages, delivering that same content to various digital platforms including the head unit in the dashboard.

        Now, I don’t want you to create a third category, “supply chain” firms. I just wanted to say that I feel much more affinity with the firms on this page than the firms on the other page. When I attend DITA-oriented conferences, the “consultants” are behind tables in the exhibitor hall. That’s not me; I’m running with the hands-on production users attending sessions and evaluating vendors, products, and consultants for possible software purchases and professional services engagements.

        Anyway, think about it. Thanks.

        1. You make some good points. When I originally came up with the separate listing, consultants were (and still do) make up the bulk of the companies represented, and I didn’t want to start a third list just for the companies that offered outsourced DITA content creation as well (which at the time would have been small, and also comprised of firms that also offered consulting services). Am thinking now that either I should list these firms separately, or perhaps simply rename that page “DITA Services” instead. Your thoughts?

  14. It’s a great list! Thank you for compiling! Is it possible to add more information on what web publishing systems these DITA users are using for their front end/publishing pipeline? Thanks!

  15. Glad you like the list! I do have that information in many cases, but I do not make that publicly-available. That information I reserve for the occasional consultation work I do.

  16. naturally like your web-site but you need to check the spelling
    on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and
    I in finding it very bothersome to tell the truth then again I will definitely come again again.

  17. Hi ditawriter,

    we are using Dita for documentation. We would appreciate to be mentioned in your list.

    NOVEXX Solutions
    http://www.novexx.com
    Industrie type: Product identification / Solutions for label printing and labeling
    Headquarter location: Eching
    Country: Germany

    Thank you very much

  18. Illusive Networks uses DITA.
    Cybersecurity deception-based SaaS
    Tel-Aviv, Israel
    I’m the technical writer. This is how I know.
    However, I’m also considering adopting a GitHub/Markdown platform. Do you have any information on a comparison of the two platforms?

    1. Which “RSSB” are you talking about? I can find several, and I want to make sure I add the right one to the list.

  19. Thanks Keith, this is a great list of companies using DITA. I work for Bluestream Database Software Corporation who provide the XDocs DITA CCMS and now XDocs Manufacturing Suite specifically for the manufacturing industry supporting Smart Documentation for the Smart Factory so perhaps you have a list for companies that provide content management solutions and professional services as we do?
    Many thanks Jackie

  20. Hi,
    Not sure if you are still updating the list, if so, could you please add ArtInChip Technology from China to the list?

    Many thanks.

    1. Thank you Amruta! I will add Metapercept Technology Services to my next update of the list, which should come later this week.

    1. Thank you Huntley! They are in the list as “Zebra”, as I understand the company underwent a new change recently.

Leave a Reply to Eddie Baron Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.